I suspect I'm grading pretty easily, partly because I'm so impressed that they can write an academic paper in a second language at all. They have read hundreds of pages of sometimes-complex SF in English, and will read hundreds of pages more (re Red Mars, Robinson has been accused of "describing every last damn rock on Mars.") That, too, seems to me to justify comparatively easy grading.
For those interested, here are the paper questions, both based on some of the works read to date:
Choose one question:
A person may accept the ideas of the world he or she grows up in, may reject those ideas, or may strive for a combination of acceptance and rejection. Discuss how this applies to two of the following characters: Berge, Koriba, Louise Banks, Shevek, Tirin. Be as specific as you can, citing incidents from the texts.
or
A person may accept the ideas of the world he or she grows up in, may reject those ideas, or may strive for a combination of acceptance and rejection. Discuss how this applies to two of the following characters: Berge, Koriba, Louise Banks, Shevek, Tirin. Be as specific as you can, citing incidents from the texts.
or
Much of science fiction is, in one way or another, concerned with power. Describe what power means and how it operates in two of the following societies: the terraformed moon of “People Came from Earth,” the Heptapod society of “The Story of Your Life,” the orbital Kirinyaga, Annares, Urras. Be sure to give specific examples from the texts.
2 comments:
Aw, Nancy, what author explored =both= those questions better than Heinlein in DOUBLE STAR (Hugo winner), STARSHIP TROOPERS (Hugo winner), STRANGER IN A STRANGE LAND (Hugo winner), and THE MOON IS A HARSH MISTRESS (by gum--a Hugo winner!)?
Not to mention the great Poul Anderson in =many= novels.
Did somebody mention Jack Vance...?
Mike--
Don't you read anybody but dead white guys? :)
Post a Comment